Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I was just waiting to know whether I should use change tracking or
not. It seems that I should not? I vote for not to use it, because
after a few changes to the same place things start becoming hardly
readable (and prone to formatting errors).
As said, I think it's unfortunate to use ct in half of the docs and ommit it
in the other half.
The use of ct was intended to make it intelligible to translators and
maintainers what had been changed, since `svn diff' is useless for this.
(Of course, if we had the LyXdiff thing....) But I have seen the problem
Enrico is pointing out.
Here's another suggestion: ct should always be used when editing docs,
but then anyone who edits the file again should accept all changes
before doing anything else. This leaves an intelligible trail for
translators and maintainers, who can update from svn one revision at a
time (svn log...) and see what was changed.
rh
