Guenter Milde <mi...@users.berlios.de> writes: > Isn't this called a "fully backwards compatible change"?
The problem is that a textclass using this on 1.6.4 would not look right when used on 1.6.3 (but would degrqde correctly IMO). JMarc
Guenter Milde <mi...@users.berlios.de> writes: > Isn't this called a "fully backwards compatible change"?
The problem is that a textclass using this on 1.6.4 would not look right when used on 1.6.3 (but would degrqde correctly IMO). JMarc