Uwe Stöhr wrote: > I forced Pavel to introduce html2 to be consistent with e.g. PDF. For PDF > there are 3 different programs we support, every one has its own format to > avoid conflicts and I like this solution. For HTML this is the same, html > is tex4ht and html2 eLyXer.
No, for HTML we have tex4ht, latex2html, hevea and eLyXer. I don't see why eLyXer is different. Either we provide the possibility to chose from all, or none. (I know Pavel is of other opinion, but I don't really understand the reasons). Jürgen
