Am Samstag 02 Mai 2009 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > The problem is that I have to give it a file extension to make Python > > > recognize it. When I do this also the problem I had with missing > > > includes disappears. > > > > You mean, calling python <path to elyxer> is not sufficient? > > it is, but the question was different - is it possible to run "elyxer" as > executable without any extension win? i think its not.
We don't _need_ to run elyxer without call python directly. > > ... > > > > > "elyxhtml" implies that it is not HTML. To avoid such > > > misinterpretations, we use for PDF output pdf2, pdf3, and so on. This > > > works well and I therefore would like to have it for HTML accordingly > > > (html is tex4ht, html2 is eLyXer). > > > > May I repeat my proposal? > > http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg148941.html > > how is it different from Uwe's vision? There were no need for elyxer to be aware of lyx2lyx. I for one am using it this way since some weeks. > pavel Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
