Le 25 avr. 09 à 00:07, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit :
I think this is a battle we cannot win (not tested, but you get the idea):So... you look for all Note insets, and execute note-insert for each and you'll end up with the double amount of Notes ?inset-forall Note note-insert
No, you find Note1, qnd you insert a note in front of it. Then you find this new note, and you insert
a note in front of it, etc. JMarc
