On Thu, 05 Oct 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> This should be an updateBufferDependent() and the insets should hide
> themselves if appropriate. I did this in the old tree and it worked fine.
> I'll commit this as it is at present however (once I've looked through and
> test compiled of course).
Allan, I've read your comments, here, in the ChangeLog and in
BufferView_pimpl.C.
As I understand it, you're suggesting that each FormXXX would store a
Buffer * dialogBuffer. This would be set to 0 when the dialog was hidden, but
would be set to the current buffer in show(). update() would check that
(dialogBuffer == lv->buffer()) and, if not, would call hide().
Is this the idea?
I have one final question. In BufferView_pimpl.C, your new
updateBufferDependent() signal occurs before the
if (!buffer_) {
buffer_ = bufferlist.first();
}
Shouldn't the signal be emitted immediately after this call? Finally, the
extra updateBufferDependent() signal in the next if( buffer ) loop is now
redundant?
Shall I have a go at all this?
Angus
