Am Freitag 13 Februar 2009 schrieb Peter Kuemmel:
> > You are doing great work here Kornel. But as for the packaging, I don't
> > think rpm is so important, I'd rather think we are in greater need of:
>
> I really like to see the generation of deb and rpm files in a way I could
> reproduce with cmake. Are these packages usable for distributions?

I am using the packages without problems. But we will have to test them on
machines which are not "fully packaged". There are no dependencies configured 
yet.

And there is one quirk in creating a zip-file. Calling
        cpack -G ZIP --config CPackConfig.cmake
in the build-directory will create here "lyx-2.0.1-Linux.zip". So far so good. 
But the listing
        unzip -l lyx-2.0.1-Linux.zip
shows a problem. The filepath's are prepended with "lyx-2.0.1-Linux", e.g.
        lyx-2.0.1-Linux/usr/local/share/lyx2.0/doc/da/Intro.lyx

I will investigate on this issue.

> > - tar.gz for UNIXes
> > - Windows installer using NSYS
> > - Whatever installation package for Mac.
> >
> > If CMake is to supplant scons on the Windows side, Windows installer is
> > the top priority IMHO.
> >
> > Abdel.

        Kornel
-- 
Kornel Benko
kornel.be...@berlin.de

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to