Am 17.01.2009 um 22:58 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:00:57PM +0100, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 17.01.2009 um 20:33 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 06:40:05PM +0100, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Did you check what exactly needs so long in updateMacros? It
essentially
just looks at the insets of each paragraph.
Which is still a bit.
If there is no macro
definition, nothing is done. Otherwise, the macro table of the
buffer is
updated. I don't see why updateMacros needs so much more time than
the
updateLabels mechanism.
Why can't that be triggered 'manually' on buffer load and on
changing
a macro definition?
Because the macro position is not constant between these points in
time.
Therefore the lookup tables would be invalid then.
But that means that we'd need something more robust than a DocIterator
as pointers. One more reason for "registered iterators"...
Yes, that would be great.
Stefan
