Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Why not something like "<no group>" then ? > > If I don't get the intention immediately, it might not be clear to > everyone.
FWIW, in my proposal, the combo has an item "None". Jürgen
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Why not something like "<no group>" then ? > > If I don't get the intention immediately, it might not be clear to > everyone.
FWIW, in my proposal, the combo has an item "None". Jürgen