Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > What is related to VC in there? mainly the intention :)
>It looks like a generic command interface. i can rename the lfun if it looks better. > Frankly, I do not think it is more useful than actually implementing the > different vc backends... the reason here was that i wanted specific things from svn which are not in the the generic VC interface and don't belong there. secondly it does not look like there will be much more implementations for different VCS than it is now and if you look in bugzilla there was interrest for them. this way you can provide at least basic integration for power users. for commiting it is still needed one more flag for commit message string, and i plan to add it. pavel
