Angus Leeming wrote: > We had one curmudgeonly gentleman, John Weiss, who point blank refused to > licence his contribution to LyX under the GPL version 2 or later. The old > flavour of this page has him down as licencing his contributions under the > artistic licence.
btw http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html says Artistic License is not compatible with GPL. what does it mean wrt lyx sources themselves? do we need to ask for Artistic license 2? pavel