rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> Yes, I've had exactly the same thought. But changing the LFUNs this >>> way is definitely not for 1.6.x, I'd think. Breaks too much.
>> Why exactly? Adding a new lfun is not a problem. We are not forced >> right now to change >> self-insert's meaning. > Sorry, I don't understand. Are you proposing to add the new LFUN but > leave self-insert's behavior unchanged? I read it this way. > This might be the best solution, then. +1 from me. Changing all occurences of self-insert with string argument into "insert" in the shipped *.bind files would contribute to more clarity (and let these bindings appear in the GUI). Günter
