Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: > > >Pavel Sanda schrieb: > >> Peter Kümmel wrote: > >>> As I could remember rcs code is completely broken in the branch, a > >>> "collateral damage" until there is a real solution. > >> > >> your remembrance is wrong, i use rcs without problems. > > > >You are right. rcs should stay in a working state as it is now. > >There are problems (bug 5389) and I'm trying to find a solution. > >But it works in general. > > > >Stephan > > I think bug 5389 has not really a relation to vs/rcs.
btw Juergen we have been discussing in the meeting adding new lfun related to rcs, which would allow to execute external command; this way user could tune rcs commands according to his needs. would you be averse to adding it to 1.6.1? pavel
