Richard Heck wrote: > I think the fileChanged() thing could be made to work. But right now, > it's all bound up with preview stuff, and I do not know anything about > this. I'm afraid to touch it.
As I understand it, fileChanged() is only activated if we use preview. What we would need to do, probably, is to set up a separate FileMonitor that scans all included files. For the time being and after rethinking the problem, I think that your change is still way better than the current situation in branch. So I'd say commit that as a first step. Jürgen
