José Matos wrote:
On Monday 27 October 2008 19:41:06 rgheck wrote:
Mea culpa. I think I must have had it the way you have it at some point.
I do remember thinking about this. (Maybe what I did, actually, was move
it out of a loop.) Anyway, I can't imagine that this patch isn't correct.

Notice that I do not like the patch because it breaks some assumptions in the way code is done for all converters. That is no converter relies on objects only available in the module scope.

I suggest to add the unicode_symbols as an object of _document_ and then it should be available to all converters. Since this is also need for lyx_1_5 I think that is the best solution.

That sounds fine to me---really, Jose, you're the expert here---though we'll then need to pass a document object, or else the unicode_symbols object, to the latex2lyx and lyx2latex routines.

rh

Reply via email to