leuven edwin wrote: > sure. one possibilty would be to have fully drawn group boxes at the first > level and try to have flat ones if they are nested to avoid clutter...
Do we have nested group boxes? IMHO, we should use only one kind of grouping all over the place. Currently, we have three approaches in the document dialog alone (normal GBs, flat GBs and some kind of hown-brewn group headings). Despite flat GBs might look more "cool", I'm all for using ordinary GBs, for the reasons outlined. Putting single elements in GBs strikes me perverse. Jürgen
