On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 18:04 +0200, rgheck wrote: > If, however, two notes (e.g.) are nested into each other, then you > can't say that "inset-settings note" _explicitly_ requests the > enclosing inset instead of the 'enclosee'.
Wrong example, the modify entries of notes are coupled to the 'next-inset-modify LFUNs, which thus are always applied to the 'next' inset. If you nest two boxes, and you choose Settings.. from the context menu, then the mentioned problems is visible. This is because Settings.. is attached to inset-settings (and not next-inset-settings). > What is odd, though, is that if you click the button for the contained > inset, then "Dissolve Inset" will dissolve the containing inset, not > the contained inset. If you click into the containing insets text > area, then that one dissolves. > Yes, I wanted to have a look at the dissolve problems, but this problem is slightly more complicated, because the function that really dissolves the inset is the same as which is used to dissolve insets when you hit backspace or so. Thus modifying this isn't that easy.. Vincent
