On 26/09/2008 14:51, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 26/09/2008 14:11, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
One not so minor comment: please use InsetCollapsable::xxx instead of
InsetText::xxx unless you explicitely don't want to use existent
InsetCollapsable method.
Better: could you tell me why I cannot directly use setText() and need
to add the InsetText:: prefix to make it compile? It has to be related
to the other version of settext added in InsetInfo, but I do not see
how.
Try to put the 'virtual' keyword in InsetText::setText(). I guess gcc
has difficulties to decide between the two versions of it because if
InsetText::setText() had a default value to it second argument, there
would be no to differentiate them.
In more intelligible words that would be:
I guess gcc has difficulties to decide between the two versions of it
because if InsetText::setText() had a default value to _its_ second
argument, there would be no _way_ to differentiate them.
Abdel.
