On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> now the questions: >> 1. complete was replaced by complete-accept. >> (complete is trying to complete in the way bash do after tab - >> find the longest common prefix from the current on.) >> is there some disagreement with it? >> > > Fine with me if it feels more intuitive, especially now with multiple > bindings. > > in case of no: >> 2. complete lfun has no binding, should we bind it (and where)? >> > > Good luck to find a good key. I guess nearly every other combination of > modifiers and tab is somehow used by the OS. On Mac alt-tab would be ok. But > on Windows it's taken. Actually, mac.bind has <Opt><Tab> bound to buffer-next (and <Opt><Shift><Tab> bound to buffer-previous). Bennett
