Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
My patch doesn't change the Tab key handling any further, it only adds
something _if_ the Tab key is bound to LFUN_CELL_FORWARD and friend.
i see. if i understand it correctly you solved the tab problem here by making
table LFUN_CELL_FORWARD lfun to be polymorphic and do also something different
than its name reveal. i don't like it much, since lfun should do what its name
refers to.
but i know - we don't have working machinery for correct solution yet...
OK. Well, we know what we have to do: We need the sort of multi-LFUN
binding you described before. Then Vincent can have a new LFUN, and you
can, too.
I'll see if I can find time to work on it this week. The outline I gave
in an earlier message seems right....
Richard
