Am 18.09.2008 um 16:28 schrieb rgheck:
José Matos wrote:
We are approaching now of the time to have a new release. I am
satisfied with a 3/4 weeks period between releases as the testing
by users that usually just take a released version is not too far
from the trunk head.
Asking a user to test if a problem remains one or two weeks later
on the new release is reasonable and we are getting good
feedback. :-)
What would you like to see in before rc3 is out?
There are some oddities in the new math macro implementation that
will need some attention before any real release. I find cursor
movement very difficult. For example, if you have a macro \val with
two arguments and type: \val\alpha, the \alpha ought (intuitively)
to go into the first argument place, but in fact it ends up after
\val, which gets nothing in its argument places. Similarly, suppose
I'm in the first argument place and type \alpha, then a space. I'd
expect this to take me to the second argument, but in fact it exits
the macro.
I think I never typed like that. If you press space after the end of
the macro, you are in the first cell. I do that without thinking about
that every time. Btw., \frac\alpha has the same behaviour. It has
nothing to do with macros...
(Tab takes me to the second argument, in fact.) I guess I could get
used to that, but I think space used to work as I've described.
What does space do in e.g. \frac? Jump to the next argument?
If somebody has a 1.5 around, please check if the behaviour was the
same there (with \frac). Otherwise it is a regression.
Stefan