Stefan Schimanski wrote: >> still want to introduce some option for accepting completion after first >> tab, >> so the current state is not the final one imho. > > Adding another LFUN for this behaviour should be easy. So you could bind > that to TAB instead of the "normal" iterative completion. I would prefer > that over yet another checkbox in the completion settings.
would you think that adding optional argument to complete lfun is ok? something like "complete finish" pavel
