Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Oh, so actually we should be *proud* we're getting so many warnings, because
| > it shows how STL-compliant we are now!
|
| Which reminds me:
|
| Under
|
| http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libstdc++/2000-q2/msg00700/sstream
|
| there is a rather straightforward implementation of sstringstreams.
| I have been using it for a while now and there seems to be no problem
| with it.
|
| Maybe this could be added to support/ and used in cases when there
| there is no "native" stringstream available?
|
| This way we could get rid of all these #ifdef HAVE_SSTREAM...
This idea is not half bad... let me have a look.
Does it work with gcc 2.95.2, without problems?
The only think I see can play tricks on us is the use of <string>...
but we certainly can hack it a bit ourselves.
Lgb
