Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
I guess this entails a rather fundamental question about our file format
and upgrading policy, that's why I'd like to hear other's opinion
Let me sum up. The question was whether we want that users will need to change
their existing documents in 1.6 in order to get them compiled due to the
change in the babel loading order.
Current results:
yes: 2 (Uwe, Abdel)
Please don't count my vote as I barely understand what's involved here.
no: 5 (Georg, Pavel, Enrico, José, me)
Any other opinions?
Enhanced solutions were proposed, but unless there are patches (and I guess
this is too late for 1.6), going back to the status quo ante (except for the
new packages that need to be loaded after babel) seems to be the way to go,
for the time being.
That would be the attached patch.
Would that have any implication with regard to pdf option for example?
When I switched my documents to 1.6 I erased everything related to that
in the preamble; I hope I won't have to change my preamble back again...
Abdel.
