rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > in this case, you can't actually do this right now, because "Note" > won't hit anything. You'd need something like "Note:Comment", or > whatever. There's reason to want what name() does here, but this > should really be another function, and name() should just give us > basic information about which inset we have.
Note that, in terms of scriptability, both "forall note:comment" and "forall note" are interesting to use. We should give this name:type syntax precise semantics across insets. JMarc
