jmarc jmentioned,
> >>>>> "hawk" == hawk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hawk> 2) I had a builid on a fresh install of debian that supposedly
> hawk> had never had a lyx before. nonetheless, without using --prefix,
> hawk> it didn't land in /usr/local, but somewhere weird like
> hawk> /usr/x11/bin
> Obvious question: do you have a /usr/X11/bin/lyx?
At the moment, no :) I did end up removing one, and this is apparently
where debian puts it now (which I don't believe was teh case in the
past). I suspect something weird happened during debian installation or
update, or oen of my bizzare network problems (which began when a
genius pulled my network cable out because "unix is a security threat"
[note: all machines here have outlook, netscape, and ofice, with
*everything* enabled!).
I had to remove *three* copies of lyx while trying to clean up: debian
put one in (I still don't know why :), I compiled one, and there was a
third one . . .
> hawk> 4) the biggy. I seem to have lost a great many bindings with the
> hawk> fresh cvs this week. The one I built a month or so ago didn't
> hawk> have the problem as badly (or maybe I didn't try as much). e.g.,
> hawk> meta-M { no longer gives me braces, and when I do them from the
> hawk> math panel, no shortcut appears on the screen.
> It is dues to the fact that M-m now opens the math menu. Lars does not
> want to have M-m bindings which are not real menu bindings. I'd be
> surprised if people like it %-]
err, err, my fingers . . . how do I retrain them? :) It took me over
ten years to get bits of word star out of them (and now that I've
mentioned this, I'll probably try to ^e my way up the screen for weeks
. . .).
We *are* going to have bindings, aren't we, even if they're not the
same? Being able to do it all from the keyboard is a big selling
point, and a major advantage over that evil equation editor in a
certain product . . . ALso, having significantly less keystrokes than
raw latex helps . . .
hawk
--
