Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> All entries satisfy this, except for LFUN_DELETE_BACKWARD_SKIP. I > > heh what about LFUN_CHAR_DELETE_BACKWARD X LFUN_CHAR_BACKWARD_SELECT. > don't you think this is inconsitency?
I see select as a modifier for the lfun (actually, I'd like to remove these functions and allow "char-backward select" instead). So in the first case, the action is delete_backward and in the second case it is backward (which is a shortcut for move_backward or something). so I would say that the naming is object_action_modifier. JMarc
