Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Wouldn't it be safer to define a Tabular::operator= and update the pointers there? Or it is that I do not know what I am talking about?operator= will automatically use the copy ctor.But Alfredo's patch defines the copy constructor from operator=...
Ah yes, you're right.
I do not understand how this automatic methods business works.
You got it correctly I think. Abdel.
JMarc
