>> No. If this is the case, Richard should have put it to the wiki. > > I didn't read all the messages but I am pretty sure Richard said exactly > what I am saying, JMarc AFAIR.
You may be right, but Richard did not put it in any of his summaries, nor did he put it in the wiki. If he had this idea once, it would be among his implementation details and were subject to change without notice. > Well I think I do now but you're right, let's postpone this discussion until > you get some more temper :-) > Sorry for resuming (again!) the discussion. I was in a pretty good mode until you accused me of not listening to Richard carefully, which reminded me my frustrations in figuring out how Richard's proposal works. During the discussions, even repeating what he had said could be me spreading confusions about his proposal. I ended up limiting myself to only his core ideas listed on the wiki. I am more than happy to know that you have some solid ideas about your proposal. We do not have to discuss it now, but you can certainly detail it on the wiki. Cheers, Bo
