> Please correct me if I am wrong Jose but I'd like to clarify that Jose never > committed to be _the_ project manager. He committed to be the _release_ > manager.
My apology again to Jose. > It looks to me that the project management is now handled in an > informal collegial way. Then my judgment was correct. There was no project manager. When a discussion went wild, nobody had the willingness , nor authority to confront anyone and cool things off. In a topic as complicated as embedding, nobody was obliged to provide an independent evaluation when such an evaluation was desperately needed. I was not talking about expressing some opinions on a particular issue, many of you have done just that. I was talking about an evaluation of the whole case. The biggest problem here is that everyone liked or disliked something (session, zip or base64, global or individual embedding, visible or invisible embedded files) but very few people, if any, realized that these are related issues in a complicated feature. If something you like costs too much, compromises have to be made. Richard had certainly failed to see this and that was one of the reasons why our communications were so difficult. Anyway, if this is the way things should be, I can live with it. I will not start the embedding discussion, or any new feature, unless someone else has seen the whole picture. Cheers, Bo
