> Sorry Bo but I have to say that you've been being unfair to Richard in > general. He had the pugnacity (or should I say stoicity?) to continue the > discussion regardless of your repeated critiscisms and I think you should > respect that.
If his proposal is as good as he claimed, how could I possibly have so many criticisms? Why couldn't he put me on defense? He replied to these criticisms by wavering from one side to another, by hiding behind the 'implementation details' excuse, by quick denial of any problem I pointed out with a proper explanation. These were exactly reasons why these discussions were so difficult. Do you think this was fair to me? Do you think he respected my time? If you guys do not want to spend time on this discussion, that is fine to me, but please do not blame me for not being cooperative. > My personal reluctance to include one approach or the other is caused more > by its social impact than its technical merit. I do not understand your point, but I do understand that it is most convenient for you to wait aside and hope for the best. > Which reminds me that there are some critical bugs related to 'listings' > that needs fixing ;-) Bug numbers, please. I just noticed that view source is not working though. Bo
