Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Such that in step 4) above the choices would now be: "Standard",
> "ContCaption", and "CaptionAbove". Got it? You don't have to
> hardcode anything, the caption inset should simply be customizable
> through layout files.
>
Well what you describe is exactly what I understood for captionabove,
captionbelow, etc. And I of course agree that this is the way to go
for them. But I still don't understand why you want another specific
layout for contcaption. For one, you won't get the correct numbering
on screen as what my patch does. And second I naively thought that
continued caption could be applicable to all kind of caption layouts
(standard, above, etc) and that it was consequently a caption
property rather than a layout. Without any consideration to latex, I
think that's exactly what I would expect as a user, that contcaption
is just about numbering.
Of course we could also have a tag 'numbering' that indicates how
numbering is done. Taking your example, that would become:
# Caption style re-definition
InsetLayout Caption:Standard
NextNoIndent 1
Align Center
AlignPossible Block, Center
Font
Size small
EndFont
LabelFont
Series Medium
Shape Italic
EndFont
Numbering increment
End
# Continued Caption definition
InsetLayout Caption:ContCaption
CopyInsetStyle Caption:Standard
LatexName contcaption
Preamble
\usepackage{caption}
\captionsetup{font=footnotesize,labelfont=it}
\newcommand{\contcaption}[1]{\ContinuedFloat\caption{#1}}
\DeclareCaptionLabelFormat{continued}{#1~#2 (continued)}
\captionsetup[ContinuedFloat]{labelformat=continued}
EndPreamble
Numbering stall
End
Martin, Richard, as you are the original authors of InsetFlex, do you think
something like that can be easily implemented? I think this could be a nice
improvment to InsetFlex.
Still, even if technically possible that would mean that we would need to also
define other layouts such for contcaptionabove, etc, wouldn't we?
Abdel.
