On Wednesday 02 April 2008 13:33:48 Bo Peng wrote: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Well, I still don't think the code is stable, and we have significant > > > > > > > > regressions. > > > > > > OTHO I am considering an alpha 2 release. Any objection? > > > > of course i didnt mean beta, when we haven't even alpha released. > > Then why alpha2? Alpha1 was not properly released right?
But it was tagged. It is usual when releasing pre-versions to jump failed versions, so this is nothing new. :-) It is easier to have the releases matching the tags in subversions. The other scenario would be too confusing. > Bo -- José Abílio
