> Actually, it is rather a shortcoming of the implementation. If we > allowed for a osx bundle-like representation (which would just have to > be zipped to be a proper embedded file), this could go seemlessly into > an svn archive. I understand this may not be doable immediately, but > it is something that would make much sense.
Could you elaborate? Is that a pure-text tar-like format? I think you are suggesting a tar-like format that is not compressed so that it can be svned. I do not know how binary files such as jpg would be represented in such a file. We are not even at alpha stage so this can be changed. Bo
