On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:58:04PM -0400, rgheck wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:31:15PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> Author: rgheck > >> Date: Mon Mar 24 13:31:07 2008 > >> New Revision: 23913 > >> > >> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/23913 > >> Log: > >> Add support for document-local layout information. GUI is to follow. > >> > > > > That's a tall order to do generally and safely. > > > > > Well, I think it's OK. It's essentially equivalent to writing a module into > the document header. So any problems we find here we'd have found elsewhere, > too, I believe. > > > For charstyles, I suggest a mechanism whereby the cursor points > > to an existing lyxtext position with a set of character > > attributes, and say "put these into a local layout". I had such a thing > > working at one point. > > > > > That would be welcome, to be sure. > > This is very much an "advanced feature", and I'm thinking to leave it > GUI-less for a while, as I play around with it. I've already got a static > TextClass::validate() routine going, though, so we can at least make sure > that people add valid layout information. Of course, if you add something,
That's good. Let's then make absolutely sure (icon: shotgun aimed at foot?) that this is in the same category as ERT and preamble. > use it, and then remove it, you'll have a (minor) problem, but that's > possible other ways already. > > If you've got other thoughts, I'd love to hear them. > > Richard > - Martin
