On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:43:20AM -0400, rgheck wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>> Should we permit inset creation without a buffer, anyway?
>>>
>>
>> In the long run probably not. Right now it's a too long shot.
>>
>> You could try to "convert" individual insets, though, by allowing
>> only constructors taking a Buffer argument.
>>
>>
> I tried starting to do this, but I think we'd probably have to do it all in
> one go, due to how the factory works: the inset Buffer gets set in
> createInset, not at creation time in createInsetHelper. So we'd at least
> have to pass the Buffer to createInsetHelper; but then most insets would
> ignore it. I guess we could do:
> if (inset && !inset.buffer())
> inset->setBuffer(buf);
> as a temporary measure?
Just
if (inset)
inset->setBuffer(buf);
would do no harm. At worst, we set the buffer twice.
Andre'
