Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Which reminds me: I'd like to have 1.6.0 shipped with 'non-fatal >> > asserts'. >> >> You mean instead of 'no asserts' as it is now? > > Yes.
Why not... JMarc
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Which reminds me: I'd like to have 1.6.0 shipped with 'non-fatal >> > asserts'. >> >> You mean instead of 'no asserts' as it is now? > > Yes.
Why not... JMarc