On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:58:29PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
> Index: src/insets/InsetCommandParams.cpp
> ===================================================================
> --- src/insets/InsetCommandParams.cpp (revision 23025)
> +++ src/insets/InsetCommandParams.cpp (working copy)
> @@ -42,14 +42,63 @@
>  
>  namespace lyx {
>  
> +ParamInfo::ParamData::ParamData(std::string const & s, bool b) :
> +     name_(s), optional_(b)

ParamInfo::ParamData::ParamData(std::string const & s, bool b)
        : name_(s), optional_(b)
{}
  

> +             //if they both end together, return true

A space after // pleast.

> +class ParamInfo {
> +public:
> +     ///
> +     class ParamData {
> +     // No parameter may be named "preview", because that is a required
> +     // flag for all commands.
> +     public:
> +             ///
> +             ParamData(std::string const &, bool);
> +             ///
> +             std::string name() const { return name_; }
> +             ///
> +             bool isOptional() const { return optional_; }
> +             ///
> +             bool operator==(ParamData const &) const;
> +             /// 
> +             bool operator!=(ParamData const & rhs) const
> +                     { return !(*this == rhs); }
> +     private:
> +             ///
> +             ParamData() {}; //don't allow any other construction

The default constructor is not auto-generated as soon as any other
contructor is manually created. So this line is not needed.
> +     /// adds a new parameter
> +     void add(std::string const & name, bool optional);
> +     ///
> +     bool empty() const { return info_.empty(); }
> +     ///
> +     size_t size() const { return info_.size(); }
> +     ///
> +     typedef std::vector<ParamData>::const_iterator const_iterator;
> +     ///
> +     const_iterator const begin() const { return info_.begin(); }

Drop the 'const' in front of the begin. It's mostly useless, and
some compilers would complain in case of std::vector<>::const_iterator
is implemented as a simple pointer.

Rest looks ok.

Andre'

Reply via email to