Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > btw i dont think that just restart is the way how to solve it. >> > there must be some httpd config which bound the number of httpd childern. >> >> Is it the number of children that causes problems? There is also a >> spamd process that has grown to +100M virtual memory. > > look again on the picture, i made more zoomed view. > i would say there is stronger correlation with the green line - especially > look on the start of the peaks.
If the httpd begin to use 1.6G of virtual memory, I am not surprised that the load increases... The question is to know how this happened: many medium-sized httpd processes, or on huge one? JMarc
