> In any case, I think we should use QApplication::cursorFlashTime() instead > of the hardcoded 400 ms. > > Abdel, resisting courageously the temptation to make a patch...
clearly you need Eve :D pavel
> In any case, I think we should use QApplication::cursorFlashTime() instead > of the hardcoded 400 ms. > > Abdel, resisting courageously the temptation to make a patch...
clearly you need Eve :D pavel