Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am tempted to collapse all the iterator classes into one (or two, for > a const variant) 'DocIterator'. It's pretty much what we have now, > except the question 'which one to use' would not arise, and > 'operator++()' wouldn't do 'the right thing'. I don't think that's a > major obstacle as e.g. ParIterator does have somewhat strange semantics > anyway.
Go for it. JMarc
