Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
For this use case a translation to the LFUN command string would be
more
suited.
Probably. But I see no need to break what we have (the question was
if the numbers should be deleted).
If we are to put some order in the LFUN, the numbers will all change
every times you insert or delete an LFUN. This is cumbersome and
probably the reason why new LFUNs were always put at the end of the enum.
Right. And surely a translation wouldn't be that hard to write. Of
course, we'd have to find where the integers were being output.
Richard
