Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, I'd rather revert the changes because they don't solve any > problem (or those problems can be solved in other non-disruptive ways), > destabilize an already working code base, put a burden that is best > avoided, and I don't like that lyx forks just for launching a stupid > script.
Yes, please revert the qprocess code. We'll introduce it again when/if it is fixed. Currently it stalls all work on trunk. JMarc
