Andre Poenitz wrote: > Well, to be honest I don't think tex2lyx is code-wise is such a bad > state that it needs a helping of Exceptionally Modern C++. There > are probably a few places that would benefit from char * -> std::string > changes but I don't really see the necessity of Singletons and boost > preprocessor macros.
I agree that tex2lyx is in a rather good state (code wise), and I found it quite easy to get into it. Unfortunately, Uwe was the only one showing interest in maintaining it, and it's a real pity he got distracted again. Jürgen
