Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb: > >>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21813 >> >> As you probably know, we cannot go beyond format 249 if we do not >> change to unicode support. I do not see this in your patch. What is >> the format you output here? It is not really 245, is it? > > As I stated in the commit note that it is still 245 (LyX 1.4.0).
It is not. I do not think that LyX 1.4.x will be able to read a file that pretends to be 245 but uses nomenclature support or the new format for bibtex inset. I am actually very surprised that lyx2lyx does not make a mess of a file with insetcommand, for example. >> I am very surprised that such a patch just went in without any discussion. > > Why? Please read my commit note and test it out. tex2lyx was in many > areas outdated and less and less of my documents could be processed. > So this is a starting point I requested to test. I'll take care of any > annotations. Isn't this what is SVN for? The process is not that you dump a big tex2lyx patch and then others are required to try it out. A better approach would have been first to implement the missing features in 245 that you could fix (actually, we are probably at 247 now). Then handle the unicode problems. This is the difficult part, but it has to be done anyway. Then continue the easy road of new features. JMarc
