Enrico Forestieri wrote: > It also doesn't work on Windows and FreeBSD, for example. I think it > would be embarrassing explaining it, as this would imply recognizing a > basic ignorance about C++, and this should not be the case.
You refer to my first or my second patch? If to the latter, please don't hesitate. I'm well aware of my basic ignorance about C++. If you agree my second patch would be a reasonable and working compromise, I'd propose to apply this, because it is safer than yours, IMHO. Jürgen
