Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > for now it simply spits out qt's portable string representation of > shortcuts. i like these better than lyx's since they are more verbose > so personally i would have lyx switch those. you can of course return > a QKeySequence instead and translate them to lyx's scheme...
LyX' keysequence object already has support for displaying sequences using Qt scheme. You could use a KeySequence object instead of a QKeySequence object and have proper display. There is no reason to be force to use the LyX internal representation for display. JMarc
