Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Good question.
Because in the
second case the change could actually mean *slower* startup times...
I don't think the difference would be noticeable... the lib/images/math
Didn't this start as a presumable startup time improvement?
I guess that was Andre' rationale yes. I am just giving some insight
that's all :-)
directory is only 6 megs in size. I don't know how the resource file is
Note that lib/images (*including* lib/images/math) is just 7.9M.
Right, we make a good team!
used within Qt but I guess that not everything is put in memory... not
sure though.
Another thing that makes me wonder, the 1.5.x lib/images dir with .xpm
images was only 2.9M. Did the xpm -> png change had some impact on load
time?
dunno...
Abdel.
