"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Instead of having predetermined categories, the first argument of >> InsetInfo could be an lfun. Then InsetInfo would just invoke this lfun >> to get the needed information. This means that the information will >> also be available for other uses (without additional cost). > > But we then need to define more LFUNs, such as LFUN_SHORTCUT_NAME?
Yes, we have already a couple of these for the sake for the lyxserver. It is just a matter of moving some code from InsetInfo to LyXFunc. >> Not really. When telling in the UserGuide that File>Open is Ctrl+O, >> one does not want to enumerate all possible uses. Actually you could >> implement both "shortcut" and "shortcuts" for these two uses. > > Maybe an overkill because most LFUN has only one shortcuts... I think there are two use cases. Uwe, are you reading us? > I am not sure. This file serves as a reference for shortcuts, and > would better not be mixed with other references. In this case, I think it is not useful. Such a file should explain what commands do and how to obtain it. The shortcuts for things like Cut are already shown in the menus, after all. JMarc
