On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 10:53:14PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > I don't think you are. Do you seriously think I am that > > > dogmatic? Come on. I can recognise a use case where insets > > > are a plain bad idea. > > > > I don't think you're dogmatic. I'm genuinely interested in what makes CT > > insets fail for you but style insets work. I have my own reasons for CT > > insets being an awful idea, but they mostly apply to style insets too. > > You're serious about this aren't you? How would you do it? Two > inset types "deleted text" and "inserted text", right? And > then you have to handle Delete, Backspace and typing > characters: typing Del the first time creates a Deleted inset; > second and later times will move characters from the right > into the inset. Etc. Backspace works naturally, deleting > inserted chars leftward. > > Is this what you mean? Sure you could do it. I would expect
I'm not really interested in implementation. This thread is all about the UI, that's what REALLY matters. Given your other post it seems that you'd actually be for an inset-based CT UI. You are at least consistent :) regards john
